Corpus theorem canonical 2026-05-27T20:53:50+00:00
Corpus v3 · Theorem cid001405THM0109canonicalv1

Asymmetric Determination

In tau-holomorphy, boundary data on L determines interior values on tau^3 asymmetrically: directional propagation along two characteristic families, no reverse constraint, Global Hartogs as wave front coverage, and uniqueness from sector independence.

Payload

Asymmetric Determination

In tau-holomorphy, boundary data on L determines interior values on tau^3 asymmetrically: directional propagation along two characteristic families, no reverse constraint, Global Hartogs as wave front coverage, and uniqueness from sector independence.

Asymmetric Determination

Summary

In tau-holomorphy, boundary data on L determines interior values on tau^3 asymmetrically: directional propagation along two characteristic families, no reverse constraint, Global Hartogs as wave front coverage, and uniqueness from sector independence.

Statement

%
\label{thm:asymmetric-determination}
In $\tau$-holomorphy ($\jj^2 = +1$),
boundary data on the lemniscate $\Lemniscate$
determines interior values on $\tau^3$
with the following properties:
\begin{enumerate}
    \item[\textup{(i)}]
          \textbf{Directional propagation.}
          Boundary data propagates into the interior
          along the two characteristic families
          of the wave equation,
          not isotropically.
    \item[\textup{(ii)}]
          \textbf{No reverse constraint.}
          Interior values do not constrain
          boundary values:
          the dependency is one-directional
          (boundary $\to$ interior).
    \item[\textup{(iii)}]
          \textbf{Global Hartogs as wave front.}
          The Hartogs extension theorem (I.T31)
          is the statement that wave-front data
          on the boundary determines
          the full interior holomorphic function.
    \item[\textup{(iv)}]
          \textbf{Uniqueness from independence.}
          The two characteristic families
          carry independent data;
          their consistency forces uniqueness
          of the interior extension.
\end{enumerate}

Proof / Justification

[Proof sketch]
Properties~(i)--(ii) follow from the hyperbolic
character of $\Box f = 0$:
data propagates along characteristics,
and hyperbolic equations have
domain-of-dependence properties
that prevent reverse information flow.
Property~(iii) identifies Hartogs extension
as the constructive analog of the elliptic
maximum principle:
where the Laplacian ``averages'' boundary data,
the wave operator ``propagates'' it.
Property~(iv) follows from the idempotent
decomposition $f = e_+ g + e_- h$:
the two components are independent,
and the boundary data for each sector
determines its interior value uniquely
(II.T27, mutual determination).

Source Context

  • Registry source: book-02.jsonl line 176
  • Manuscript source: 2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part11/ch61-master-switch.tex lines 434-467

Lean / Formalization Notes

  • Formalization: formalized
  • Module: TauLib.BookII.Mirror.WaveHolomorphy
  • Name: asymmetric_determination

Dependencies

  • Canonical: I.T05, I.T10, I.T31, II.D21, II.T26, II.T37

Generated by later projection phases.

Generated by later projection phases.

Revision Notes

  • 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.

Identifiers

  • Corpus ID cid001405
  • Primary alias THM0109
  • Type Theorem
  • Status canonical
  • Visibility public
  • Version v1

Aliases & legacy IDs

II.T44asymmetric-determinationthm:asymmetric-determination

Release lines

corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2

Relations

Formalized by (9)

Appears in (1)

Downstream uses (computed) (18)

Items in the corpus that reference this one via load-bearing relations. Computed from the full corpus-v3 graph at build time.

Sources

  • Monograph cid000001Book II, Part 11, Chapter 61 (Part XI)

Version & History

  • v1 · 2026-05-10 imported from v2 registry
  • v1 · 2026-05-10 wired formalized by in wave 5

Status disclaimer

A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.

Save or share this page for inspection

Download a portable dossier, copy a reviewer note, or send this page to someone who can inspect it.

Email to expert