Verification SurfaceCanonical

Life Verification

Verification for the τ-framework's life layer (Book VI): explanatory adequacy, biological constraint checks, biomarker correlates anchored to the K_χ chirality channel, and empirical humility.

Public Lean · 31 modules · 476/476 formalized Mode · Formal + Empirical Bridge · Strong (100%)

In plain language

Life verification asks whether the framework recovers biological constraint — organization, heredity, selection, development, agency — without quietly replacing empirical biology by formal analogy. Book VI's claim is that all of biology's universal regularities (homochirality, ATP universality, the genetic code, circadian timing, neural-defect asymmetry in consciousness) propagate from a single structural anchor: the Kinetic Pseudoscalar Channel K_χ (LG-Y02 / VI.L18) which amplifies a weak-sector chirality seed into biological-scale homochirality. Verification means checking each predicted biomarker against measurement, and asking whether the structural derivation chains hold. The 78 life-glossary entries each carry an empirical correlate (biomarker + measurable range + observation method).

At a glance

Book

VI

Life sector · K_χ multi-branch tree (chirality / energy / information / temporal / phenomenal).

TauLib modules

31

5329 lines of Lean 4 across life-domain modules.

Lean coverage

476 / 476

Formalized declarations · 100% formal · 0 sorries.

Glossary entries

78

Each carries a biomarker + measurable range + observation method.

Per-book Lean coverage

| Book | Modules | Lines | |------|--------:|------:| | Book VI | 31 | 5329 |

Inspection routes

Formalization

TauLib Status

Per-module formalization for the life layer · 476 formalized declarations · 100% formal.

Bridge

Bridge Verification

How K_χ amplification of weak-sector chirality bridges to homochirality, ATP universality, and the genetic code.

Glossary

Life Glossary

78 sealed entries · biomarker correlates · 5 K_χ branches.

Recovery

Life Core Semantics

The language the theory must earn before it can answer life-domain questions — recovery targets and status.

Audit

How to Verify (Philosopher)

Reviewer route for philosophy of biology, autopoiesis / IIT / FEP comparison, and the derivation-vs-redefinition test.

Results

Life Results Hub

55 life results · K_χ multi-branch tree · landmark results · empirical correlates.

Verification burden

Life verification asks whether a claim recovers biological constraint, organization, heredity, selection, development, and agency without replacing empirical biology by formal analogy. Explanatory adequacy is necessary here but is not the same as laboratory confirmation or external acceptance.

The framework’s life-sector commitments anchor at the Kinetic Pseudoscalar Channel (LG-Y02, registry VI.L18), a parity-odd time-even operator that amplifies the weak-sector chirality seed (~10⁻¹⁷) into biological-scale homochirality (ee ≈ 1.0). Every life-sector empirical correlate inherits its observable signature from this anchor — see the calibration tree for the full multi-branch architecture.

The program may report a structural explanation or recovery route before a biological mechanism is externally accepted. That status must remain visible: internal adequacy, empirical support, and external review are separate questions.

Key glossary terms

LG-Y02-kinetic-pseudoscalar-channel Kinetic Pseudoscalar Channel LG-E01-atp ATP/ADP Oscillation LG-M01-consciousness Consciousness

Cross-domain bridges

This verification surface intersects glossary terms that bridge to other domains. The τ-framework's cross-domain pivots are the structural junctions where verification claims meet the empirical, life, and metaphysical readouts.

Save or share this page for inspection

Download a portable dossier, copy a reviewer note, or send this page to someone who can inspect it.

Email to expert