THM0089canonicalv1e from Index Arithmetic
Euler's number e is earned from within tau via index arithmetic: it is the unique growth rate eigenvalue of the nu-iterator, with three equivalent characterizations (factorial series, compound limit, index-arithmetic trace).
Payload
e from Index Arithmetic
Euler’s number e is earned from within tau via index arithmetic: it is the unique growth rate eigenvalue of the nu-iterator, with three equivalent characterizations (factorial series, compound limit, index-arithmetic trace).
e from Index Arithmetic
Summary
Euler’s number e is earned from within tau via index arithmetic: it is the unique growth rate eigenvalue of the nu-iterator, with three equivalent characterizations (factorial series, compound limit, index-arithmetic trace).
Statement
%
\label{thm:e-index}
Let $P_k = p_1 \cdots p_k$ be the $k$th primorial
and let $n_k = p_{k+1}$ be the $(k{+}1)$th prime.
Then:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[\textup{(i)}]
The sequence
$\bigl(1 + 1/n_k\bigr)^{n_k}$
is computable in earned index arithmetic
\textup{(I.D06, Book~I)}
at every finite stage.
\item[\textup{(ii)}]
The Archimedean values satisfy
$\bigl|\,
(1 + 1/n_k)^{n_k} - e
\,\bigr|
\;\leq\;
e / (2 n_k)$
for all $k \geq 1$.
\item[\textup{(iii)}]
The primorial-weighted partial sums
\[
E_k
\;:=\;
\sum_{m=0}^{k} \frac{1}{m!}
\;\in\; \mathbb{Q}
\]
satisfy $|E_k - e| \leq 3/(k{+}1)!$
and each $E_k$ has denominator dividing~$k!$,
hence is representable
in the CRT tower at stage~$k$
whenever $k! \mid P_k$.
\item[\textup{(iv)}]
$e$ is transcendental over~$\mathbb{Q}$
\textup{(Hermite, 1873)}.
In particular, $e$ is not a finite-stage
rational;
it arises only at the profinite limit.
\end{enumerate}
Proof / Justification
\textbf{(i)}
At stage~$k$, the index arithmetic
operates in $\mathbb{Z}/P_{k+1}\mathbb{Z}$.
The integer $n_k = p_{k+1}$
is coprime to~$P_k$,
so $1/n_k = n_k^{-1} \pmod{P_{k+1}}$ exists.
The expression $(1 + n_k^{-1})^{n_k} \pmod{P_{k+1}}$
is a well-defined integer;
its computation requires $O(\log n_k)$
modular multiplications by repeated squaring.
\textbf{(ii)}
The classical estimate for the convergence rate
of $(1+1/n)^n$ to~$e$ is
\[
e - \Bigl(1 + \frac{1}{n}\Bigr)^n
\;=\;
\frac{e}{2n} + O(1/n^2).
\]
This follows from taking logarithms:
$n \log(1 + 1/n) = 1 - 1/(2n) + O(1/n^2)$,
hence $(1+1/n)^n = e^{1 - 1/(2n) + O(1/n^2)}
= e \cdot (1 - 1/(2n) + O(1/n^2))$.
Substituting $n = n_k = p_{k+1}$ gives the bound.
\textbf{(iii)}
The exponential series $e = \sum_{m=0}^\infty 1/m!$
converges absolutely.
The tail bound is
$\sum_{m=k+1}^\infty 1/m! \leq 3/(k{+}1)!$
for $k \geq 0$.
Each partial sum $E_k$ has denominator $k!$.
The condition $k! \mid P_k$ holds for~$k$
up to the largest prime in the primorial,
since $P_k = p_1 \cdots p_k$
contains all prime factors of~$k!$
when $k \leq p_k$
(which holds for all $k \geq 1$
by Bertrand's postulate).
\textbf{(iv)}
Hermite's 1873 proof of the transcendence of~$e$
is classical.
In the $\tau$-framework,
transcendence means that~$e$
does not coincide with any
finite-stage rational coordinate:
no element of
$\mathbb{Q} \subset \tau^3$
maps to~$e$ under the denotation map
(II.D23, Chapter~\ref{ch:orthodox-bridge}).
$e$ exists only as a profinite limit.
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-02.jsonlline 71 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part05/ch26-e-earned.texlines 206-250
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookII.Transcendentals.EEarned - Name:
e_three_perspectives_check
Dependencies
- Canonical: I.D04, I.D06, I.T05, I.T35, II.D14, II.T20
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
II.T23e-from-index-arithmeticthm:e-indexRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Appears in (1)
Sources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.