THM0074canonicalv1Hausdorff Property
tau^3 is Hausdorff: any two distinct points are separated by disjoint cylinder neighborhoods at the first disagreement depth.
Payload
Hausdorff Property
tau^3 is Hausdorff: any two distinct points are separated by disjoint cylinder neighborhoods at the first disagreement depth.
Hausdorff Property
Summary
tau^3 is Hausdorff: any two distinct points are separated by disjoint cylinder neighborhoods at the first disagreement depth.
Statement
%
\label{thm:hausdorff}
The topological space $\tau^3$ is Hausdorff:
for any two distinct points $x, y \in \tau^3$,
there exist disjoint open sets $U \ni x$ and $V \ni y$.
Proof / Justification
Let $x \neq y$.
The ultrametric distance satisfies
$d(x,y) > 0$
(Definition~\ref{def:ultrametric-distance},
identity of indiscernibles).
Let $\delta(x,y) = k < \infty$
be the first disagreement depth
(Definition~\ref{def:first-disagreement-depth}).
Then $\pi_{k+1}(x) \neq \pi_{k+1}(y)$,
so the stage-$(k{+}1)$ cylinders
$C_{k+1}(x)$ and $C_{k+1}(y)$ are disjoint:
they are distinct elements of the partition
$\{C_{k+1}(r) : r \in \mathbb{Z}/P_{k+1}\mathbb{Z}\}$.
Set $U = C_{k+1}(x)$ and $V = C_{k+1}(y)$.
Both are open (they are basis elements),
$x \in U$, $y \in V$,
and $U \cap V = \varnothing$.
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-02.jsonlline 32 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part03/ch13-stone-space.texlines 303-309
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookII.Topology.StoneSpace - Name:
hausdorff_check
Dependencies
- Canonical: II.D13, II.T05
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
II.T08hausdorff-propertythm:hausdorffRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Appears in (1)
Sources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.