THM0069canonicalv1Fibration Structure
The fibered product tau^3 = tau^1 x_f T^2 is a non-trivial fibration: surjective projection, varying fiber, no global trivialization, and injective ABCD chart.
Payload
Fibration Structure
The fibered product tau^3 = tau^1 x_f T^2 is a non-trivial fibration: surjective projection, varying fiber, no global trivialization, and injective ABCD chart.
Fibration Structure
Summary
The fibered product tau^3 = tau^1 x_f T^2 is a non-trivial fibration: surjective projection, varying fiber, no global trivialization, and injective ABCD chart.
Statement
%
\label{thm:fibration-structure}
The fibered product $\tau^3 = \tau^1 \times_f T^2$
is a fibration over $\tau^1$:
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Projection.}
The map $\mathrm{pr} \colon \tau^3 \to \tau^1$
is surjective:
every base point admits at least one fiber point
(the trivial exponent tower $B = 1, C = 0$).
\item \textbf{Fiber variation.}
The fiber $T^2_{(D,A)}$ depends on the base point $(D,A)$:
different primes $A$ yield different admissible ranges
for $(B,C)$.
\item \textbf{Non-triviality.}
The fibration is not a product bundle:
there is no global trivialization
$\tau^3 \cong \tau^1 \times T^2$
because the peel-order constraint
couples the base coordinates
and the admissibility conditions
vary across base points.
\item \textbf{Faithfulness.}
The fibered product is faithful to the ABCD chart:
the map
$\Phi \colon \mathrm{Obj}(\tau) \to \tau^3$
given by $X \mapsto (D(X), A(X), B(X), C(X))$
is injective
(by hyperfactorization, I.T04).
\end{enumerate}
Proof / Justification
[Proof sketch]
Surjectivity of $\mathrm{pr}$:
for any $(D, A) \in \tau^1$,
the object $D \cdot A$ has ABCD coordinates
$(D, A, 1, 0)$, so $(1, 0) \in T^2_{(D,A)}$.
Fiber variation:
if $A = p_1$ (the smallest prime),
then $D = 1$ necessarily (no smaller primes exist),
and the exponent range for $B$ is unrestricted;
if $A = p_k$ for large $k$,
then $D$ can be a product of $k-1$ smaller primes,
and the interaction between $D$ and $A$
constrains the admissible tetration heights.
Non-triviality:
suppose a global trivialization existed.
Then for every base point $(D, A)$,
the fiber would be the same space $T^2_0$.
But the constraint ``prime factors of $D < A$''
means that the admissible objects
over $(1, p_1)$ are different in kind
from those over $(p_1 \cdot p_2, p_3)$---the
fiber geometry depends essentially on the base.
Faithfulness is the Hyperfactorization Theorem (I.T04).
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-02.jsonlline 14 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part01/ch06-tau3-fibration.texlines 287-318
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookII.Interior.Tau3Fibration - Name:
Tau.BookII.Interior.surjective_2_to_20
Dependencies
- Canonical: II.D07, I.T04
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
II.T03fibration-structurethm:fibration-structureRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Appears in (1)
Sources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.