PRP0058canonicalv1Enrichment Iteration
Enrichment Iteration
Payload
Enrichment Iteration
Enrichment Iteration
Enrichment Iteration
Summary
Enrichment Iteration
Statement
%
\label{prop:enrichment-iteration}
The self-enrichment of~$\tau$ iterates:
for each integer $n \geq 0$,
there is a strict $n$-category $\tau_n$
with the following structure.
\begin{enumerate}
\item[\textup{(I1)}]
\textbf{$n$-cells.}
For $0 \leq k \leq n$,
the $k$-cells of~$\tau_n$
are elements of iterated hom-objects.
Specifically:
\begin{itemize}
\item 0-cells: objects of~$\tau$.
\item 1-cells between 0-cells $A,B$:
elements of $[A,B]$.
\item 2-cells between 1-cells $f,g$:
elements of $[f,g] \subset [[A,B],[A,B]]$.
\item $k$-cells: elements of the
$k$-fold iterated hom-object
$\underbrace{[\cdots[}_{k}A,B]\cdots]$.
\end{itemize}
\item[\textup{(I2)}]
\textbf{Tower coherence at each level.}
Every $k$-cell has a tower-coherent
stagewise representation.
At stage~$m$, the $k$-cell restricts
to a map on the stage-$m$ version
of the $(k-1)$-fold iterated hom-object.
The system is compatible
under the primorial tower projections.
\item[\textup{(I3)}]
\textbf{Bipolar decomposition at each level.}
Every $k$-cell $\sigma$
decomposes as
$\sigma = e_+ \cdot \sigma_+ + e_- \cdot \sigma_-$,
with the two channels independent.
The idempotents $e_\pm$
are central in~$H_\tau$,
so they commute with all compositions
at all levels.
Consequently:
\[
\tau_n
\;\cong\;
\tau_n^+ \times \tau_n^-
\]
for every~$n$,
where $\tau_n^\pm = e_\pm \cdot \tau_n$
is the $n$-category restricted to one channel.
\item[\textup{(I4)}]
\textbf{Holomorphic structure at each level.}
Every $k$-cell is $\tau$-holomorphic:
it satisfies the split-complex
Cauchy--Riemann conditions
in the appropriate iterated hom-space.
This is because each iterated hom-object
is a $\tau$-object
and therefore carries holomorphic structure
by the results of Parts~VI--VII.
\item[\textup{(I5)}]
\textbf{Strict $n$-category axioms.}
At each level~$k$:
\begin{itemize}
\item Vertical composition
of $k$-cells is associative.
\item Identity $k$-cells exist.
\item Horizontal composition
with $(k-1)$-cells is functorial.
\item The interchange law holds.
\end{itemize}
\end{enumerate}
Proof / Justification
We proceed by induction on~$n$.
\emph{Base case $n = 0$.}
$\tau_0 = \tau$ is a plain category.
All five properties hold vacuously for $k$-cells
with $k > 0$ (there are none),
and for $k = 0$ they reduce to
the fact that $\tau$ is a category
with NF-addressable objects
and $H_\tau$-valued morphisms.
\emph{Base case $n = 1$.}
$\tau_1 = \tau$ viewed as an enriched category.
The 1-cells are morphisms,
which are $\tau$-objects (II.D54),
tower-coherent (by construction of self-enrichment),
and bipolar (II.P11).
Composition and identities are given.
\emph{Inductive step $n \to n + 1$.}
Assume $\tau_n$ is a strict $n$-category
satisfying (I1)--(I5).
We construct $\tau_{n+1}$
by adding a new layer of cells.
The $(n+1)$-cells between $n$-cells
$\sigma, \sigma'$ are the elements of
$[\sigma, \sigma']$
in the iterated hom-object.
Self-enrichment (II.D53) guarantees
that this is a well-defined $\tau$-object.
\textbf{(I2):}
Tower coherence at level $n+1$
follows from tower coherence at level~$n$
plus the fact that hom-objects are tower-coherent
(II.D54 gives this for the first iteration;
the same argument applies at each level
because the hom construction
is internal to~$\tau$).
\textbf{(I3):}
Bipolar decomposition at level $n+1$
follows from II.L07 (Idempotent Decomposition Lemma).
The iterated hom-object at level $n+1$
is a $\tau$-object valued in~$H_\tau$,
so the decomposition
$\sigma = e_+ \sigma_+ + e_- \sigma_-$
applies.
Channel independence follows from
$e_+ e_- = 0$.
\textbf{(I4):}
Holomorphic structure follows because
$\tau$-objects carry holomorphic structure
(Parts~VI--VII).
The iterated hom-object is a $\tau$-object,
hence holomorphic.
\textbf{(I5):}
The strict $n$-category axioms at level $n+1$:
\begin{itemize}
\item Vertical composition at level $n+1$
is composition in the endomorphism space
of the level-$n$ hom-object.
Associativity follows from
associativity of function composition.
\item Identity $(n+1)$-cells
are the identity maps
in the endomorphism space.
\item Horizontal composition
is given by the action of the composition map~$\mu$
on the new level.
Functoriality follows from
the enriched category axioms of~$\tau$.
\item The interchange law
at level $n+1$
follows from the functoriality of~$\mu$
at the previous level,
by the same argument
as in Definition~\ref{def:two-category}.
\qedhere
\end{itemize}
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-02.jsonlline 132 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part08/ch44-two-categories.texlines 591-669
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookII.Enrichment.TwoCategories - Name:
Tau.BookII.Enrichment.enrichment_iteration_check
Dependencies
- Canonical: II.D53, II.D54, II.D55, II.D56, II.L07
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
II.P12enrichment-iterationprop:enrichment-iterationRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Formalized by (4)
Appears in (1)
Downstream uses (computed) (8)
Items in the corpus that reference this one via load-bearing relations. Computed from the full corpus-v3 graph at build time.
FTH0253formal theorem
FTH0253formal theorem
FTH0254formal theorem
FTH0254formal theorem
FTH0256formal theorem
FTH0256formal theorem
FTH0257formal theorem
FTH0257formal theoremSources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.