PRP0057canonicalv1Hom Bipolar Decomposition
Hom Bipolar Decomposition
Payload
Hom Bipolar Decomposition
Hom Bipolar Decomposition
Hom Bipolar Decomposition
Summary
Hom Bipolar Decomposition
Statement
%
\label{prop:hom-bipolar}
For any $A, B \in \mathrm{Obj}(\tau)$,
the Hom object $[A,B]$ decomposes as
\[
\boxed{%
[A,B]
\;=\;
e_+ \cdot [A,B]_+
\;+\;
e_- \cdot [A,B]_-,}
\]
where:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[\textup{(i)}]
$[A,B]_+ := e_+ \cdot [A,B]$
is the \textbf{B-channel component}---the
space of B-channel projections
of morphisms from $A$ to $B$.
\item[\textup{(ii)}]
$[A,B]_- := e_- \cdot [A,B]$
is the \textbf{C-channel component}---the
space of C-channel projections.
\item[\textup{(iii)}]
The two components are \textbf{independent}:
modifying $[A,B]_+$
does not affect $[A,B]_-$,
and vice versa.
\item[\textup{(iv)}]
The decomposition is
\textbf{functorial in both arguments}:
for any $\tau$-morphism
$h : B \to B'$,
the postcomposition map
$h_* : [A,B] \to [A,B']$
respects the bipolar decomposition,
i.e., $h_*([A,B]_\pm) \subseteq [A,B']_\pm$.
Similarly for precomposition.
\end{enumerate}
Proof / Justification
By Proposition~\ref{prop:ch42-hom-tau-objects},
$[A,B]$ is a $\tau$-object.
The Idempotent Decomposition Lemma
(Lemma~\ref{lem:idempotent-decomposition}, II.L07,
Chapter~\ref{ch:idempotent-decomposition})
states that every $\tau$-object decomposes
canonically as $X = e_+ X_+ + e_- X_-$,
where $X_\pm = e_\pm X$.
Applied to $X = [A,B]$,
this gives the decomposition (i)--(ii).
\emph{Independence (iii).}
The idempotents satisfy
$e_+ \cdot e_- = 0$
(I.D21, Book~I).
Therefore
$e_+ \cdot [A,B]_- = e_+ e_- \cdot [A,B] = 0$,
and symmetrically
$e_- \cdot [A,B]_+ = 0$.
The two components live in orthogonal sub-modules of $H_\tau$,
so they are algebraically independent.
\emph{Functoriality (iv).}
Let $h : B \to B'$ be a $\tau$-morphism.
The postcomposition map
$h_* : [A,B] \to [A,B']$
is defined by $h_*(f) := h \circ f$.
Since $h$ is $\tau$-holomorphic,
$h$ commutes with the idempotent projection
(II.P09, Chapter~\ref{ch:idempotent-decomposition}):
\[
e_\pm \cdot (h \circ f)
\;=\;
(e_\pm h) \circ (e_\pm f)
\;=\;
h_\pm \circ f_\pm.
\]
Here we use the fact that
the idempotents $e_\pm$ are central in $H_\tau$
and that composition in $\tau$ is $H_\tau$-bilinear
(it respects the $H_\tau$ module structure
at each stage).
Hence $h_*(f)_\pm = h_\pm \circ f_\pm$,
which means $h_*([A,B]_\pm) \subseteq [A,B']_\pm$.
The precomposition argument is symmetric.
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-02.jsonlline 127 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part08/ch42-tau-self-enrichment.texlines 680-723
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookII.Enrichment.SelfEnrichment - Name:
Tau.BookII.Enrichment.hom_bipolar_check
Dependencies
- Canonical: I.D21, I.T05, II.L07, II.D54
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
II.P11hom-bipolar-decompositionprop:hom-bipolarRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Formalized by (2)
Appears in (1)
Downstream uses (computed) (4)
Items in the corpus that reference this one via load-bearing relations. Computed from the full corpus-v3 graph at build time.
Sources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.