Corpus proposition canonical 2026-05-27T20:53:50+00:00
Corpus v3 · Proposition cid001352PRP0057canonicalv1

Hom Bipolar Decomposition

Hom Bipolar Decomposition

Payload

Hom Bipolar Decomposition

Hom Bipolar Decomposition

Hom Bipolar Decomposition

Summary

Hom Bipolar Decomposition

Statement

%
\label{prop:hom-bipolar}
For any $A, B \in \mathrm{Obj}(\tau)$,
the Hom object $[A,B]$ decomposes as
\[
    \boxed{%
    [A,B]
    \;=\;
    e_+ \cdot [A,B]_+
    \;+\;
    e_- \cdot [A,B]_-,}
\]
where:
\begin{enumerate}
    \item[\textup{(i)}]
          $[A,B]_+ := e_+ \cdot [A,B]$
          is the \textbf{B-channel component}---the
          space of B-channel projections
          of morphisms from $A$ to $B$.

    \item[\textup{(ii)}]
          $[A,B]_- := e_- \cdot [A,B]$
          is the \textbf{C-channel component}---the
          space of C-channel projections.

    \item[\textup{(iii)}]
          The two components are \textbf{independent}:
          modifying $[A,B]_+$
          does not affect $[A,B]_-$,
          and vice versa.

    \item[\textup{(iv)}]
          The decomposition is
          \textbf{functorial in both arguments}:
          for any $\tau$-morphism
          $h : B \to B'$,
          the postcomposition map
          $h_* : [A,B] \to [A,B']$
          respects the bipolar decomposition,
          i.e., $h_*([A,B]_\pm) \subseteq [A,B']_\pm$.
          Similarly for precomposition.
\end{enumerate}

Proof / Justification

By Proposition~\ref{prop:ch42-hom-tau-objects},
$[A,B]$ is a $\tau$-object.
The Idempotent Decomposition Lemma
(Lemma~\ref{lem:idempotent-decomposition}, II.L07,
Chapter~\ref{ch:idempotent-decomposition})
states that every $\tau$-object decomposes
canonically as $X = e_+ X_+ + e_- X_-$,
where $X_\pm = e_\pm X$.
Applied to $X = [A,B]$,
this gives the decomposition (i)--(ii).

\emph{Independence (iii).}
The idempotents satisfy
$e_+ \cdot e_- = 0$
(I.D21, Book~I).
Therefore
$e_+ \cdot [A,B]_- = e_+ e_- \cdot [A,B] = 0$,
and symmetrically
$e_- \cdot [A,B]_+ = 0$.
The two components live in orthogonal sub-modules of $H_\tau$,
so they are algebraically independent.

\emph{Functoriality (iv).}
Let $h : B \to B'$ be a $\tau$-morphism.
The postcomposition map
$h_* : [A,B] \to [A,B']$
is defined by $h_*(f) := h \circ f$.
Since $h$ is $\tau$-holomorphic,
$h$ commutes with the idempotent projection
(II.P09, Chapter~\ref{ch:idempotent-decomposition}):
\[
    e_\pm \cdot (h \circ f)
    \;=\;
    (e_\pm h) \circ (e_\pm f)
    \;=\;
    h_\pm \circ f_\pm.
\]
Here we use the fact that
the idempotents $e_\pm$ are central in $H_\tau$
and that composition in $\tau$ is $H_\tau$-bilinear
(it respects the $H_\tau$ module structure
at each stage).
Hence $h_*(f)_\pm = h_\pm \circ f_\pm$,
which means $h_*([A,B]_\pm) \subseteq [A,B']_\pm$.
The precomposition argument is symmetric.

Source Context

  • Registry source: book-02.jsonl line 127
  • Manuscript source: 2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part08/ch42-tau-self-enrichment.tex lines 680-723

Lean / Formalization Notes

  • Formalization: formalized
  • Module: TauLib.BookII.Enrichment.SelfEnrichment
  • Name: Tau.BookII.Enrichment.hom_bipolar_check

Dependencies

  • Canonical: I.D21, I.T05, II.L07, II.D54

Generated by later projection phases.

Generated by later projection phases.

Revision Notes

  • 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.

Identifiers

  • Corpus ID cid001352
  • Primary alias PRP0057
  • Type Proposition
  • Status canonical
  • Visibility public
  • Version v1

Aliases & legacy IDs

II.P11hom-bipolar-decompositionprop:hom-bipolar

Release lines

corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2

Relations

Formalized by (2)

Appears in (1)

Downstream uses (computed) (4)

Items in the corpus that reference this one via load-bearing relations. Computed from the full corpus-v3 graph at build time.

Sources

  • Monograph cid000001Book II, Part 8, Chapter 42 (Part VI-B)

Version & History

  • v1 · 2026-05-10 imported from v2 registry
  • v1 · 2026-05-10 wired formalized by in wave 5

Status disclaimer

A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.

Save or share this page for inspection

Download a portable dossier, copy a reviewer note, or send this page to someone who can inspect it.

Email to expert