LEM0023canonicalv1Yoneda Application
The Yoneda bijection identifies natural transformations with omega-germ transformers via a tower-coherent family of stage-k components.
Payload
Yoneda Application
The Yoneda bijection identifies natural transformations with omega-germ transformers via a tower-coherent family of stage-k components.
Yoneda Application
Summary
The Yoneda bijection identifies natural transformations with omega-germ transformers via a tower-coherent family of stage-k components.
Statement
%
\label{lem:yoneda-application}
There is a canonical bijection
\[
\boxed{%
\mathrm{Nat}\bigl(y(\tau^3),\, y(H_\tau)\bigr)
\;\xleftrightarrow{\;\sim\;}
\{\textup{$\omega$-germ transformers on } \tau^3
\textup{ valued in } H_\tau\}.}
\]
Under this bijection,
a natural transformation
$\eta \colon y(\tau^3) \to y(H_\tau)$
corresponds to the $\omega$-germ transformer~$G_\eta$
defined by:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[\textup{(i)}]
At each stage~$k$,
the component $G_{\eta,k} \colon
\mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z} \to H_\tau / P_k H_\tau$
is defined by
$G_{\eta,k}(a) := \pi_k\bigl(\eta_{\mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z}}(\iota_k^a)\bigr)$,
where $\iota_k^a \colon \mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z} \to \tau^3$
is the stage-$k$ probe selecting class~$a$.
\item[\textup{(ii)}]
The family $(G_{\eta,k})_{k \geq 1}$
is tower-coherent:
the naturality square
applied to the projection
$\mathbb{Z}/P_{k+1}\mathbb{Z}
\to \mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z}$
ensures
$\pi_{k+1 \to k}(G_{\eta,k+1}(b))
= G_{\eta,k}(\pi_{k+1 \to k}(b))$
for all $b \in \mathbb{Z}/P_{k+1}\mathbb{Z}$.
\item[\textup{(iii)}]
The tower-coherent family
$(G_{\eta,k})_{k \geq 1}$
defines an $\omega$-germ transformer
in the sense of
Book~I (I.D47--I.D49):
a coherent system of stagewise maps
whose inverse limit is a map
$\tau^3 \to H_\tau$ at the $\omega$-level.
\end{enumerate}
Conversely, every $\omega$-germ transformer
$G = (G_k)_{k \geq 1}$
defines a natural transformation
$\eta_G$ by reversing the construction:
$(\eta_G)_P(\varphi) := G \circ \varphi$,
where the composition is interpreted stagewise.
Proof / Justification
The proof has two directions.
\smallskip
\noindent\textbf{Forward: natural transformation $\to$ $\omega$-germ transformer.}
Let $\eta \colon y(\tau^3) \to y(H_\tau)$
be a natural transformation.
By Proposition~\ref{prop:ch50-primorial-probes},
every probe factors through a finite stage,
so $\eta$ is determined by its action
on stage-$k$ probes for all~$k$.
At stage~$k$, the stage-$k$ probes
are indexed by $a \in \mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z}$,
so $\eta$ at stage~$k$ defines a function
$G_{\eta,k} \colon \mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z} \to H_\tau / P_k H_\tau$.
The naturality square for the projection
$\mathbb{Z}/P_{k+1}\mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z}$
gives tower coherence (item~(ii)).
The resulting tower-coherent family
is an $\omega$-germ transformer (item~(iii)).
\smallskip
\noindent\textbf{Backward: $\omega$-germ transformer $\to$ natural transformation.}
Let $G = (G_k)_{k \geq 1}$
be an $\omega$-germ transformer.
For any test object~$P$ and probe
$\varphi \colon P \to \tau^3$,
choose $k$ such that $\varphi$
factors through stage~$k$
(Proposition~\ref{prop:ch50-primorial-probes}):
$\varphi = \iota_k \circ \varphi_k$.
Define
\[
(\eta_G)_P(\varphi) := \iota_k^{H_\tau} \circ G_k \circ \varphi_k,
\]
where $\iota_k^{H_\tau}$
is the stage-$k$ inclusion into~$H_\tau$.
This is well-defined (independent of the choice of~$k$)
by tower coherence of~$G$.
Naturality of~$\eta_G$
follows from the stagewise composition structure:
for $\psi \colon Q \to P$,
\begin{align*}
(\eta_G)_Q(\varphi \circ \psi)
&= G \circ (\varphi \circ \psi) \\
&= (G \circ \varphi) \circ \psi \\
&= (\eta_G)_P(\varphi) \circ \psi,
\end{align*}
where the middle step uses the associativity
of stagewise composition
(Theorem~\ref{thm:associativity}, II.T28,
Chapter~\ref{ch:composition-structure}).
\smallskip
\noindent\textbf{Bijectivity.}
The two maps are inverse to each other:
starting from~$\eta$, constructing~$G_\eta$,
then reconstructing $\eta_{G_\eta}$
recovers~$\eta$ on all probes
(because probes determine~$\eta$ completely
by the Yoneda embedding, II.T36).
Starting from~$G$, constructing~$\eta_G$,
then extracting $G_{\eta_G}$
recovers~$G$ at each stage
(by the probe decomposition,
Proposition~\ref{prop:ch50-primorial-probes}).
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-02.jsonlline 145 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part09/ch50-yoneda-applied.texlines 276-330
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookII.CentralTheorem.YonedaApplied - Name:
Tau.BookII.CentralTheorem.yoneda_application_check
Dependencies
- Canonical: II.T35, II.L13, II.R12, II.D50, II.P10
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
II.L14yoneda-applicationlem:yoneda-applicationRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Formalized by (3)
Appears in (1)
Downstream uses (computed) (6)
Items in the corpus that reference this one via load-bearing relations. Computed from the full corpus-v3 graph at build time.
FTH0168formal theorem
FTH0168formal theorem
FTH0169formal theorem
FTH0169formal theorem
FTH0173formal theorem
FTH0173formal theoremSources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.