Corpus lemma canonical 2026-05-27T20:53:50+00:00
Corpus v3 · Lemma cid001329LEM0011canonicalv1

Refinement-Spectral Equivalence

Refinement sequence data (stage-by-stage tower values) is equivalent to spectral decomposition data (bipolar channel coefficients): each determines the other via the canonical basis expansion.

Payload

Refinement-Spectral Equivalence

Refinement sequence data (stage-by-stage tower values) is equivalent to spectral decomposition data (bipolar channel coefficients): each determines the other via the canonical basis expansion.

Refinement-Spectral Equivalence

Summary

Refinement sequence data (stage-by-stage tower values) is equivalent to spectral decomposition data (bipolar channel coefficients): each determines the other via the canonical basis expansion.

Statement

%
\label{lem:refinement-spectral}
Let $(f_k)_{k \geq n}$ be a tower-coherent sequence
in~$H_\tau$ stabilized after stage~$n$.
Then there exists a unique finite spectral decomposition
\[
    f_k
    \;=\;
    \sum_{\chi \in S_n} c_\chi \cdot \chi_k,
    \qquad
    k \geq n,
\]
where $S_n \subset \widehat{R}_\tau$ is a finite
support set
and $\chi_k$ is the restriction
of the character~$\chi$ to stage~$k$.
Conversely, every spectral tail
with finite support
defines a tower-coherent refinement tail.

Proof / Justification

\emph{Forward direction ($\mathrm{R} \Rightarrow \mathrm{S}$).}
At each stage~$k$, the map
$f_k \colon \mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z} \to H_\tau$
is a function on a finite cyclic group.
By the Chinese Remainder Theorem (I.T18, Book~I),
$\mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z} \cong
\prod_{j=1}^k \mathbb{Z}/p_j\mathbb{Z}$,
and the characters of $\mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z}$
are products of characters
of the individual factors.
The discrete Fourier transform
on $\mathbb{Z}/P_k\mathbb{Z}$
decomposes $f_k$ into a finite sum
of characters with coefficients in $H_\tau$.

The bipolar decomposition applies:
each coefficient $c_\chi \in H_\tau$
splits as $c_\chi = e_+ c_\chi^+ + e_- c_\chi^-$.
Tower coherence
($f_k \equiv f_{k+1} \pmod{P_k}$)
forces the spectral coefficients
at stage~$k+1$ to reduce
to those at stage~$k$
modulo the new prime~$p_{k+1}$.
Since the tail is stabilized after stage~$n$,
no new spectral components appear
for $k > n$:
the support $S_n$ is fixed,
and the coefficients refine consistently.

\emph{Reverse direction ($\mathrm{S} \Rightarrow \mathrm{R}$).}
Given a spectral tail with finite support $S_n$
and coefficients $(c_\chi)_{\chi \in S_n}$ in~$H_\tau$,
define $f_k := \sum_{\chi \in S_n} c_\chi \cdot \chi_k$.
Tower coherence follows from the coherence
of the characters:
$\chi_{k+1} \equiv \chi_k \pmod{P_k}$
by construction of the dual group.
Stabilization after stage~$n$ is immediate
since $S_n$ is fixed.

\emph{Uniqueness.}
The DFT on a finite abelian group
is invertible,
so the spectral decomposition
at each stage is unique.
Coherence forces the decompositions at different stages
to be compatible,
and stabilization ensures
the system has a unique limit.

Source Context

  • Registry source: book-02.jsonl line 85
  • Manuscript source: 2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part06/ch31-mutual-determination.tex lines 213-233

Lean / Formalization Notes

  • Formalization: formalized
  • Module: TauLib.BookII.Hartogs.MutualDetermination
  • Name: Tau.BookII.Hartogs.refine_spectral_check

Dependencies

  • Canonical: I.T18, I.D21, II.D33, II.D35

Generated by later projection phases.

Generated by later projection phases.

Revision Notes

  • 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.

Identifiers

  • Corpus ID cid001329
  • Primary alias LEM0011
  • Type Lemma
  • Status canonical
  • Visibility public
  • Version v1

Aliases & legacy IDs

II.L02refinement-spectral-equivalencelem:refinement-spectral

Release lines

corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2

Relations

Appears in (1)

Sources

  • Monograph cid000001Book II, Part 6, Chapter 31 (Part V)

Version & History

  • v1 · 2026-05-10 imported from v2 registry

Status disclaimer

A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.

Save or share this page for inspection

Download a portable dossier, copy a reviewer note, or send this page to someone who can inspect it.

Email to expert