LEM0010canonicalv1Naturality Forces Cylinder Compatibility
Naturality Forces Cylinder Compatibility
Payload
Naturality Forces Cylinder Compatibility
Naturality Forces Cylinder Compatibility
Naturality Forces Cylinder Compatibility
Summary
Naturality Forces Cylinder Compatibility
Statement
%
\label{lem:naturality-cylinder}
Let $f$ be an $\omega$-germ transformer.
Then for every stage~$k$ and every point $x \in \tau^3$:
\[
\boxed{f\bigl(C_k(x)\bigr)
\;\subseteq\;
C_k\bigl(f(x)\bigr),}
\]
where $C_k(x)$ denotes the stage-$k$ cylinder at~$x$
(Definition~\ref{def:stage-k-cylinder}, Chapter~\ref{ch:cylinder-domains}).
That is, $f$ maps the stage-$k$ cylinder at~$x$
into the stage-$k$ cylinder at~$f(x)$.
Proof / Justification
Let $y \in C_k(x)$.
By the definition of stage-$k$ cylinder (II.D10),
this means $\pi_k(y) = \pi_k(x)$:
the points $x$ and~$y$ agree at stage~$k$
of the primorial tower.
By tower coherence of~$f$
(the naturality condition of Notation~\ref{not:ch11-omega-germ}):
\[
\pi_k\bigl(f(y)\bigr)
\;=\;
f_k\bigl(\pi_k(y)\bigr)
\;=\;
f_k\bigl(\pi_k(x)\bigr)
\;=\;
\pi_k\bigl(f(x)\bigr).
\]
Hence $f(y) \in C_k(f(x))$.
Since $y \in C_k(x)$ was arbitrary,
$f(C_k(x)) \subseteq C_k(f(x))$.
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-02.jsonlline 28 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part02/ch11-hol-implies-cont.texlines 270-284
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookII.Domains.HolImpliesCont - Name:
cyl_compat_check
Dependencies
- Canonical: I.D47, II.D10, I.T18
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
II.L01naturality-forces-cylinder-compatibilitylem:naturality-cylinderRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Appears in (1)
Sources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.