Corpus definition canonical 2026-05-27T20:53:50+00:00
Corpus v3 · Definition cid001327DEF0201canonicalv1

Combined Gain-Cost Ledger

Combined gain-cost ledger: 49 gains (23 Mode D + 13 Mode E + 17 neutral) vs 16 Mode C costs. No partial selection possible due to trade-off atomicity.

Payload

Combined Gain-Cost Ledger

Combined gain-cost ledger: 49 gains (23 Mode D + 13 Mode E + 17 neutral) vs 16 Mode C costs. No partial selection possible due to trade-off atomicity.

Combined Gain-Cost Ledger

Summary

Combined gain-cost ledger: 49 gains (23 Mode D + 13 Mode E + 17 neutral) vs 16 Mode C costs. No partial selection possible due to trade-off atomicity.

Statement

%
\label{def:combined-ledger}
The \textbf{Combined Gain--Cost Ledger}
across Books~I--II
tallies all mode-classified constructions:

\medskip
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.25}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{@{}clrrl@{}}
\toprule
\textbf{Mode} & \textbf{Name}
  & \textbf{Book~I} & \textbf{Book~II} & \textbf{Assessment} \\
\midrule
A & Same      &  4 &  3 & Identical objects \\
B & Parallel  &  5 &  5 & Same axioms, different carriers \\
C & Refused   &  9 &  7 & Genuine costs \\
D & Gained    & 13 & 10 & Structurally impossible in ZFC \\
E & Earned    &  7 &  6 & Derivation replaces postulation \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{2}{@{}l}{\textbf{Total gains (D+E)}}
  & 20 & 16 & \textbf{36} \\
\multicolumn{2}{@{}l}{\textbf{Total costs (C)}}
  &  9 &  7 & \textbf{16} \\
\multicolumn{2}{@{}l}{\textbf{Neutral (A+B)}}
  &  9 &  8 & \textbf{17} \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{2}{@{}l}{\textbf{Grand total}}
  & 38 & 31 & \textbf{69} \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

\medskip
\noindent
Including Mode~A and~B constructions
that carry additional $\tau$-specific structure,
the gain count rises to approximately 49.
The cost count remains 16.
The ratio is approximately $3{:}1$ gains to costs.

This ratio is \emph{not} evidence
that $\tau$ is ``better.''
It reflects the structural fact
that categoricity, while expensive
(16 refusals),
produces many downstream consequences
(each gain is a theorem that follows
from categoricity + the forced sign).
The costs are concentrated at the foundation;
the gains cascade through the structure.

Proof / Justification

This item is definitional. No manuscript proof is required.

Source Context

  • Registry source: book-02.jsonl line 225
  • Manuscript source: 2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part11/ch66-master-trade-off.tex lines 223-275

Lean / Formalization Notes

  • Formalization: planned
  • Module: None
  • Name: None

Dependencies

  • Canonical: II.D91, II.D82, II.D92

Generated by later projection phases.

Generated by later projection phases.

Revision Notes

  • 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.

Identifiers

  • Corpus ID cid001327
  • Primary alias DEF0201
  • Type Definition
  • Status canonical
  • Visibility public
  • Version v1

Aliases & legacy IDs

II.D93combined-gain-cost-ledgerdef:combined-ledger

Release lines

corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2

Relations

Appears in (1)

Sources

  • Monograph cid000001Book II, Part 11, Chapter 66 (Part XI)

Version & History

  • v1 · 2026-05-10 imported from v2 registry

Status disclaimer

A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.

Save or share this page for inspection

Download a portable dossier, copy a reviewer note, or send this page to someone who can inspect it.

Email to expert