DEF0201canonicalv1Combined Gain-Cost Ledger
Combined gain-cost ledger: 49 gains (23 Mode D + 13 Mode E + 17 neutral) vs 16 Mode C costs. No partial selection possible due to trade-off atomicity.
Payload
Combined Gain-Cost Ledger
Combined gain-cost ledger: 49 gains (23 Mode D + 13 Mode E + 17 neutral) vs 16 Mode C costs. No partial selection possible due to trade-off atomicity.
Combined Gain-Cost Ledger
Summary
Combined gain-cost ledger: 49 gains (23 Mode D + 13 Mode E + 17 neutral) vs 16 Mode C costs. No partial selection possible due to trade-off atomicity.
Statement
%
\label{def:combined-ledger}
The \textbf{Combined Gain--Cost Ledger}
across Books~I--II
tallies all mode-classified constructions:
\medskip
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.25}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{@{}clrrl@{}}
\toprule
\textbf{Mode} & \textbf{Name}
& \textbf{Book~I} & \textbf{Book~II} & \textbf{Assessment} \\
\midrule
A & Same & 4 & 3 & Identical objects \\
B & Parallel & 5 & 5 & Same axioms, different carriers \\
C & Refused & 9 & 7 & Genuine costs \\
D & Gained & 13 & 10 & Structurally impossible in ZFC \\
E & Earned & 7 & 6 & Derivation replaces postulation \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{2}{@{}l}{\textbf{Total gains (D+E)}}
& 20 & 16 & \textbf{36} \\
\multicolumn{2}{@{}l}{\textbf{Total costs (C)}}
& 9 & 7 & \textbf{16} \\
\multicolumn{2}{@{}l}{\textbf{Neutral (A+B)}}
& 9 & 8 & \textbf{17} \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{2}{@{}l}{\textbf{Grand total}}
& 38 & 31 & \textbf{69} \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\medskip
\noindent
Including Mode~A and~B constructions
that carry additional $\tau$-specific structure,
the gain count rises to approximately 49.
The cost count remains 16.
The ratio is approximately $3{:}1$ gains to costs.
This ratio is \emph{not} evidence
that $\tau$ is ``better.''
It reflects the structural fact
that categoricity, while expensive
(16 refusals),
produces many downstream consequences
(each gain is a theorem that follows
from categoricity + the forced sign).
The costs are concentrated at the foundation;
the gains cascade through the structure.
Proof / Justification
This item is definitional. No manuscript proof is required.
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-02.jsonlline 225 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part11/ch66-master-trade-off.texlines 223-275
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
planned - Module:
None - Name:
None
Dependencies
- Canonical: II.D91, II.D82, II.D92
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
II.D93combined-gain-cost-ledgerdef:combined-ledgerRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Appears in (1)
Sources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.