DEF0162canonicalv1Self-Enrichment Structure
Self-Enrichment Structure
Payload
Self-Enrichment Structure
Self-Enrichment Structure
Self-Enrichment Structure
Summary
Self-Enrichment Structure
Statement
%
\label{def:self-enrichment}
Category~$\tau$ is \textbf{self-enriched}:
it is enriched over itself
as a monoidal category
$(\tau, \times, \mathbf{1})$,
where $\times$ denotes the Cartesian product
in~$\tau$
and $\mathbf{1}$ is the terminal object.
Concretely, self-enrichment means
the following three conditions hold:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[\textup{(SE1)}]
\textbf{Internal Hom objects.}
For every pair $A, B \in \mathrm{Obj}(\tau)$,
the Hom object
$[A,B]$
(Definition~\ref{def:hom-object}, II.D54)
is an object of~$\tau$.
\item[\textup{(SE2)}]
\textbf{Composition is a $\tau$-morphism.}
For every triple $A, B, C \in \mathrm{Obj}(\tau)$,
the composition map
\[
\circ_{A,B,C}
\;:\;
[B,C] \times [A,B]
\;\longrightarrow\;
[A,C]
\]
is a morphism in~$\tau$---i.e.,
it is $\tau$-holomorphic,
NF-addressable, tower-coherent,
and valued in $H_\tau$.
\item[\textup{(SE3)}]
\textbf{Identity is a $\tau$-morphism.}
For every $A \in \mathrm{Obj}(\tau)$,
the identity selection
\[
\mathrm{id}_A
\;:\;
\mathbf{1}
\;\longrightarrow\;
[A,A]
\]
is a morphism in~$\tau$---i.e.,
the identity map $\mathrm{id}_A$
is a $\tau$-object
sitting inside the Hom object $[A,A]$.
\end{enumerate}
\medskip\noindent
These three conditions are subject to the standard
\textbf{enriched category axioms}:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[\textup{(EC1)}]
\emph{Associativity.}
The diagram
\[
[C,D] \times [B,C] \times [A,B]
\;\rightrightarrows\;
[A,D]
\]
commutes: composing $(h,g,f)$ as
$(h \circ g) \circ f$ or $h \circ (g \circ f)$
yields the same result.
\item[\textup{(EC2)}]
\emph{Unit laws.}
For all $A, B$:
$\mathrm{id}_B \circ f = f = f \circ \mathrm{id}_A$
in $[A,B]$.
\end{enumerate}
Both (EC1) and (EC2) hold in~$\tau$
by the associativity theorem
(Theorem~\ref{thm:associativity}, II.T29,
Chapter~\ref{ch:composition-structure})
and the identity construction
(Definition~\ref{def:identity-map}, II.D40,
Chapter~\ref{ch:composition-structure}).
Proof / Justification
This item is definitional. No manuscript proof is required.
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-02.jsonlline 125 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-ii-categorical-holomorphy/02_mainmatter/part08/ch42-tau-self-enrichment.texlines 393-476
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookII.Enrichment.SelfEnrichment - Name:
Tau.BookII.Enrichment.hom_stage
Dependencies
- Canonical: I.D20, I.D21, I.T05, I.T40, II.L07, II.D49, II.T33, II.D50
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
II.D53self-enrichment-structuredef:self-enrichmentRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Formalized by (3)
Appears in (1)
Downstream uses (computed) (6)
Items in the corpus that reference this one via load-bearing relations. Computed from the full corpus-v3 graph at build time.
FTH0248formal theorem
FTH0248formal theorem
FTH0249formal theorem
FTH0249formal theorem
FTH0255formal theorem
FTH0255formal theoremSources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.