Bibliography · Foundations and Logic

The Myth of Repressed Memory: False Memories and Allegations of Sexual Abuse

Book Formal Antecedent Foundations and Logic

Citation

Elizabeth Loftus and Katherine Ketcham. (1996). The Myth of Repressed Memory: False Memories and Allegations of Sexual Abuse. St. Martin’s Press.

Why this reference is included

Loftus and Ketcham’s The Myth of Repressed Memory: False Memories and Allegations of Sexual Abuse (1996), published by St. Martin’s Press, sits in the program’s reference corpus as a standing technical source. Cited in Book VII (Categorical Metaphysics), Part 9, Chapter Personal Identity Over Time, where the program draws on it in the context of “The malleability of memory further shows that memory is a reconstructive process, not a faithful archive.”

Cited in

  • Book VII — Categorical Metaphysics Part 9
    Chapter Personal Identity Over Time
    The malleability of memory further shows that memory is a reconstructive process, not a faithful archive

Bibliographic Details

BibTeX KeyLoftus1996
AuthorsElizabeth Loftus and Katherine Ketcham
Year
TypeBook
PublisherSt. Martin's Press