Relation (multi-source admissible morphism)
A relation, in the τ-framework, is an admissible morphism (or admissible diagram) connecting multiple particulars to a shared structural position — either a universal or a colimit-object. Binary relations are pair-source morphisms; n-ary relations are diagrams of arity n. Per the relational primacy principle (VII.D23), relations are ontologically prior to relata: a particular's identity is given by its relational position, not by relata-independent substance.
τ-Definition
A relation, in the τ-framework, is an admissible morphism (or admissible diagram) connecting multiple particulars to a shared structural position — either a universal or a colimit-object. Binary relations are pair-source morphisms; n-ary relations are diagrams of arity n. Per the relational primacy principle (VII.D23), relations are ontologically prior to relata: a particular's identity is given by its relational position, not by relata-independent substance.
Categorical invariant. R is an n-ary relation among (a₁,…,aₙ) ⟺ ∃ admissible diagram D : {aᵢ} → U_R in K_τ.
Primary registry anchor:
VII.D23
τ-Derivation Chain
-
VII.D25— Internal Set Ontology — relata and relation-targets are NF-addressable. -
VII.D23— Relational Primacy — relations precede relata; identity is determined by relational position, not intrinsic substance. -
VII.D36— Abstract Object as Structural Position — relation-targets are positions; n-ary relations are admissible diagrams targeting them. -
VII.D40— Non-Dualistic Platonism — relations are morphisms (or diagrams of morphisms), not a separate ontological tier.
Lean modules referenced:
TauLib.BookVII.Meta.Registers
Phenomenological Correlate
A relation is instantiated wherever multiple subjects share a connecting predicate: 'a is taller than b', 'a is parent of b and c', 'this lemma supports those theorems', 'this commitment binds these agents'. Each multi-place predication is an admissible diagram in the appropriate register's morphism-class. Relational primacy means the relata are constituted by their relational position — there are no relata-independent particulars waiting to enter relations.
Examples:
- Empirical: 'a is taller than b' — admissible binary diagram in Reg_E targeting the taller-than relation-object, with a, b as relata.
- Genealogical: 'a is parent of b and c' — admissible ternary diagram in Reg_E (or Reg_P, depending on the legal/biological framing) with a, b, c as relata.
- Proof-theoretic: 'this lemma supports those theorems' — admissible diagram in Reg_D from the lemma to each supported theorem.
- Commitment-theoretic: 'this contract binds these signatories' — admissible diagram in Reg_C from contract-content to each signatory's stance.
Register codomain: Cross-register (relations are register-relative; the diagram structure is uniform).
Manuscript reference: manuscript-sources/book-07/part02/ch16.tex
Lean Coverage
Status: Formalized
Module: TauLib.BookVII.Meta.Registers
Lean kind: structure
Lean symbol: Tau.BookVII.Meta.Registers.NonDualisticPlatonism