Why neutron not electron as anchor
The neutron is chosen as calibration anchor because it is ontologically prior: a composite defect bundle whose existence is guaranteed by the strong-sector structure of T^2. The electron mass is a derived prediction, not an input. The derivation m_e = m_n/R at 0.025 ppm is the mo
What this page is
This is a public Results-lane surface for a noteworthy Physics Registry item. It is generated from the Corpus Registry triage catalogue and keeps the generic Result catalogue unchanged.
Registry evidence
- Registry item: IV.R190
- Type: remark
- Scope: tau-effective
- Lean status: formalized
- Book / part / chapter: Book IV · Part 8 · Chapter 57
Result summary
The neutron is chosen as calibration anchor because it is ontologically prior: a composite defect bundle whose existence is guaranteed by the strong-sector structure of T^2. The electron mass is a derived prediction, not an input. The derivation m_e = m_n/R at 0.025 ppm is the most precise test of the entire framework.
Related Results surfaces
- Cryogenic electron emission
- Electron Mass at 0.025 ppm: 10-Link Derivation from K0–K6
- Electron Mass at 0.025 ppm: 10-Link Derivation from K0–K6
Reading role
Use as Registry evidence for an existing Results surface.
Claim boundary
This page reports a Registry-backed internal result surface. It is not an external validation claim, a scientific consensus claim, or independent acceptance.
Curation rationale
- physics-facing terms: electron, mass, neutron
- result-facing terms: calibration, derivation, prediction
- candidate is better handled as evidence for an inferred existing public surface
Review notes
- No additional review notes recorded.