Corpus theorem canonical 2026-05-27T20:53:50+00:00
Corpus v3 · Theorem cid001626THM0169canonicalv1

No Barrier Theorem

At E₂, no encoding gap exists between external and internal computation. TTM τ-Nativity means programs ARE τ-addresses: code = data, no translation layer. The 1st Edition's Representation Barrier was a category error (asking E₂ question with E₀ tools).

Payload

No Barrier Theorem

At E₂, no encoding gap exists between external and internal computation. TTM τ-Nativity means programs ARE τ-addresses: code = data, no translation layer. The 1st Edition’s Representation Barrier was a category error (asking E₂ question with E₀ tools).

No Barrier Theorem

Summary

At E₂, no encoding gap exists between external and internal computation. TTM τ-Nativity means programs ARE τ-addresses: code = data, no translation layer. The 1st Edition’s Representation Barrier was a category error (asking E₂ question with E₀ tools).

Statement

\label{thm:no-barrier}
Let $\Pi$ be a $\tau$-admissible NP problem with TTM verifier $V$
of interface width $k_0$
(Definition~\ref{def:tau-admissibility}).
At $\Elayer{2}$, the self-referential structure of the $\tau$-Tower
Machine (Theorem~\ref{thm:ttm-tau-nativity}) eliminates the
encoding gap:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)] Programs, data, and decoders are all $\tau$-addresses
      in $\hat{\mathbb{Z}}_{\T}$. No encoding map
      $E \colon \{0,1\}^* \to \mathrm{Addr}(\tau)$ is needed.
\item[(ii)] Faithfulness, reduction-preservation, and
      witness-completeness are satisfied by the identity on
      $\hat{\mathbb{Z}}_{\T}$.
\item[(iii)] The $\tau$-Admissibility Collapse
      (Theorem~\ref{thm:tau-admissibility-collapse}) holds without
      encoding overhead:
      $\tau\text{-}P_{\mathrm{adm}} = \tau\text{-}NP_{\mathrm{adm}}$
      is a theorem about $\tau$-addresses acting on $\tau$-addresses.
\end{enumerate}

Proof / Justification

No immediate manuscript proof block was extracted in this pilot run.

Source Context

  • Registry source: book-03.jsonl line 158
  • Manuscript source: 2nd-edition/book-iii-categorical-spectrum/02_mainmatter/part09/ch59-why-there-is-no-barrier.tex lines 140-161

Lean / Formalization Notes

  • Formalization: formalized
  • Module: TauLib.BookIII.Computation.CompBiSquare
  • Name: no_barrier_check

Dependencies

  • Canonical: III.T33, III.D56, III.D49, III.D50, III.T30

Generated by later projection phases.

Generated by later projection phases.

Revision Notes

  • 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.

Identifiers

  • Corpus ID cid001626
  • Primary alias THM0169
  • Type Theorem
  • Status canonical
  • Visibility public
  • Version v1

Aliases & legacy IDs

III.T34no-barrier-theoremthm:no-barrier

Release lines

corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2

Relations

Formalized by (1)

Appears in (1)

Downstream uses (computed) (2)

Items in the corpus that reference this one via load-bearing relations. Computed from the full corpus-v3 graph at build time.

Sources

  • Monograph cid000024Book III, Part 9, Chapter 59 (Part VII)

Version & History

  • v1 · 2026-05-10 imported from v2 registry
  • v1 · 2026-05-10 wired formalized by in wave 5

Status disclaimer

A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.

Save or share this page for inspection

Download a portable dossier, copy a reviewer note, or send this page to someone who can inspect it.

Email to expert