Corpus proposition canonical 2026-05-27T20:53:50+00:00
Corpus v3 · Proposition cid001555PRP0078canonicalv1

Primorial RH Verification Protocol

Six-step verification protocol: (i) compute Spec(H_{≤k}), (ii) verify Im(Λ) = 0 for all eigenvalues, (iii) verify zero locations of finite Euler product, (iv) check tower coherence with previous levels, (v) validate CRT consistency, (vi) record primorial certificate. Polynomial in k.

Payload

Primorial RH Verification Protocol

Six-step verification protocol: (i) compute Spec(H_{≤k}), (ii) verify Im(Λ) = 0 for all eigenvalues, (iii) verify zero locations of finite Euler product, (iv) check tower coherence with previous levels, (v) validate CRT consistency, (vi) record primorial certificate. Polynomial in k.

Primorial RH Verification Protocol

Summary

Six-step verification protocol: (i) compute Spec(H_{≤k}), (ii) verify Im(Λ) = 0 for all eigenvalues, (iii) verify zero locations of finite Euler product, (iv) check tower coherence with previous levels, (v) validate CRT consistency, (vi) record primorial certificate. Polynomial in k.

Statement

\label{prop:primorial-rh-protocol}
Fix primorial depth $k \geq 1$. The following protocol verifies the $\tau$-effective RH statement at depth $k$:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textbf{Step \arabic*.}]
    \item \textbf{Construct $H_{L_k}$}: Using the definition from Chapter~23, compute the $k \times k$ matrix representation of $H_{L_k}$ in the basis $\{e_1, \ldots, e_k\}$. Entry $(i,j)$ is given by the bipolar coupling $\langle e_i, e_j \rangle_\jj$.

    \item \textbf{Certify self-adjointness}: Verify that $H_{L_k}$ is Hermitian (in the split-complex inner product). This is guaranteed by Theorem~III.T17; the verification step checks consistency.

    \item \textbf{Compute spectrum}: Using certified interval arithmetic (e.g., Arb library), compute $\operatorname{Spec}(H_{L_k})$ with rigorous error bounds. Verify that all eigenvalues have $|\Im(\lambda)| < \epsilon$ for machine tolerance $\epsilon$.

    \item \textbf{Locate zeros}: For each real eigenvalue $\lambda_j$, compute the corresponding zero $s_j = \tfrac{1}{2} + i\lambda_j$ of the finite Euler product $\zeta_{L_k}(s)$ via the determinant representation
    \[
    \det(s \cdot I - H_{L_k}) \stackrel{?}{=} C_k(s) \cdot \zeta_{L_k}(s),
    \]
    where $C_k(s)$ is a normalization polynomial. Verify that $\zeta_{L_k}(s_j) \approx 0$ within tolerance.

    \item \textbf{Check critical line}: Confirm that all zeros $s_j$ satisfy $|\Re(s_j) - \tfrac{1}{2}| < \epsilon$.

    \item \textbf{Tower coherence}: If $k > 1$, verify that the spectrum $\operatorname{Spec}(H_{L_{k-1}})$ is a subset of $\operatorname{Spec}(H_{L_k})$ up to tolerance, consistent with the nesting property of primorial towers.
\end{enumerate}
The protocol runs in $O(k^3)$ time (dominated by eigenvalue computation) and outputs a certified \textsc{pass/fail} verdict.

Proof / Justification

No immediate manuscript proof block was extracted in this pilot run.

Source Context

  • Registry source: book-03.jsonl line 72
  • Manuscript source: 2nd-edition/book-iii-categorical-spectrum/02_mainmatter/part04/ch26-primorial-verification-of-rh.tex lines 64-84

Lean / Formalization Notes

  • Formalization: formalized
  • Module: TauLib.BookIII.Doors.CriticalLine
  • Name: rh_protocol_check

Dependencies

  • Canonical: III.D30, III.T09

Generated by later projection phases.

Generated by later projection phases.

Revision Notes

  • 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.

Identifiers

  • Corpus ID cid001555
  • Primary alias PRP0078
  • Type Proposition
  • Status canonical
  • Visibility public
  • Version v1

Aliases & legacy IDs

III.P11primorial-rh-verification-protocolprop:primorial-rh-protocol

Release lines

corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2

Relations

Appears in (1)

Sources

  • Monograph cid000024Book III, Part 4, Chapter 26 (Part IV)

Version & History

  • v1 · 2026-05-10 imported from v2 registry

Status disclaimer

A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.

Save or share this page for inspection

Download a portable dossier, copy a reviewer note, or send this page to someone who can inspect it.

Email to expert