PRP0010canonicalv1Metric Inequality
ell_spine(x) <= ell_DAG(x) <= ell_occ(x). Three canonical complexity metrics: spine length (radial depth), DAG size (memoized work), occurrence size (naive work).
Payload
Metric Inequality
ell_spine(x) <= ell_DAG(x) <= ell_occ(x). Three canonical complexity metrics: spine length (radial depth), DAG size (memoized work), occurrence size (naive work).
Metric Inequality
Summary
ell_spine(x) <= ell_DAG(x) <= ell_occ(x). Three canonical complexity metrics: spine length (radial depth), DAG size (memoized work), occurrence size (naive work).
Statement
%
\label{prop:metric-inequality}
For every $x \in \tau\text{-Idx}$:
\[
\boxed{\ell_{\mathrm{spine}}(x)
\;\leq\;
\ell_{\mathrm{DAG}}(x)
\;\leq\;
\ell_{\mathrm{occ}}(x).}
\]
Proof / Justification
The spine visits only the $D$-children,
which form a subpath of the DAG.
So $\ell_{\mathrm{spine}} \leq \ell_{\mathrm{DAG}}$.
The DAG has at most as many nodes
as the quadtree has occurrences,
since the DAG identifies repeated nodes.
So $\ell_{\mathrm{DAG}} \leq \ell_{\mathrm{occ}}$.
The first inequality is strict
whenever $x$ has nontrivial index children
(i.e., when some coordinate is not $\alpha_1$).
The second is strict whenever any index
appears more than once in the full quadtree.
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-01.jsonlline 63 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-i-categorical-foundations/02_mainmatter/part04/ch20-dimension-fibration.texlines 447-458
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookI.Coordinates.ABCD - Name:
Tau.Coordinates.metric_inequality_check
Dependencies
- Canonical: I.D24
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
I.P09metric-inequalityprop:metric-inequalityRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Appears in (1)
Sources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.