PRP0009canonicalv1Dimension Theorem (dim_tau = 4)
dim_tau = 4: the four ABCD coordinates are pairwise independent (sufficiency) and no three suffice (necessity). Dimension is earned from arithmetic hierarchy, not postulated.
Payload
Dimension Theorem (dim_tau = 4)
dim_tau = 4: the four ABCD coordinates are pairwise independent (sufficiency) and no three suffice (necessity). Dimension is earned from arithmetic hierarchy, not postulated.
Dimension Theorem (dim_tau = 4)
Summary
dim_tau = 4: the four ABCD coordinates are pairwise independent (sufficiency) and no three suffice (necessity). Dimension is earned from arithmetic hierarchy, not postulated.
Statement
%
\label{prop:dim-tau}
The dimension of the ABCD coordinate system is exactly $4$:
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Sufficiency:}
The four coordinates $(A, B, C, D)$
suffice to encode every object in $\Obj(\tau)$.
\item \textbf{Necessity:}
No three of the four coordinates
suffice to encode all objects.
\end{enumerate}
Proof / Justification
\emph{Sufficiency.}
This is the content of the NF existence theorem
(Proposition~\ref{prop:nf-existence}):
every object has an ABCD encoding.
\emph{Necessity.}
We show that omitting any single coordinate
causes information loss.
Omit $D$:
Objects $\underline{p}$ and $\underline{p} \cdot \underline{q}$
(for primes $\underline{p} > \underline{q}$)
share $(A, B, C) = (\underline{p}, \underline{1}, \underline{1})$
but have $D = \underline{1}$ and $D = \underline{q}$ respectively.
Without $D$, they are conflated.
Omit $A$:
Objects $\underline{2}$ and $\underline{3}$
share $(B, C, D) = (\underline{1}, \underline{1}, \underline{1})$
but have $A = \underline{2}$ and $A = \underline{3}$.
Without $A$, they are conflated.
Omit $B$:
Objects $\underline{p}$ and $\underline{p}^2$
(for any prime $\underline{p}$)
share $(A, C, D) = (\underline{p}, \underline{1}, \underline{1})$
but have $B = \underline{1}$ and $B = \underline{2}$.
Without $B$, they are conflated.
Omit $C$:
Objects $\underline{p}$ and
$\underline{p} \uparrow\uparrow \underline{2}
= \underline{p}^{\underline{p}}$
share the same prime $A = \underline{p}$
but have $C = \underline{1}$ and $C = \underline{2}$.
The exponent changes from $B = \underline{1}$
to $B = \underline{1}$
(with the tetration height carrying the new structure),
so $(A, B, D) = (\underline{p}, \underline{1}, \underline{1})$
for both.
Without $C$, they are conflated.
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-01.jsonlline 56 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-i-categorical-foundations/02_mainmatter/part04/ch20-dimension-fibration.texlines 108-120
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookI.Coordinates.ABCD - Name:
Tau.Coordinates.dim_tau_eq_four
Dependencies
- Canonical: I.D17, I.D06
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
I.P08dimension-theorem-dim-tau-4prop:dim-tauRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Appears in (1)
Sources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.