Corpus proposition canonical 2026-05-27T20:53:50+00:00
Corpus v3 · Proposition cid001131PRP0009canonicalv1

Dimension Theorem (dim_tau = 4)

dim_tau = 4: the four ABCD coordinates are pairwise independent (sufficiency) and no three suffice (necessity). Dimension is earned from arithmetic hierarchy, not postulated.

Payload

Dimension Theorem (dim_tau = 4)

dim_tau = 4: the four ABCD coordinates are pairwise independent (sufficiency) and no three suffice (necessity). Dimension is earned from arithmetic hierarchy, not postulated.

Dimension Theorem (dim_tau = 4)

Summary

dim_tau = 4: the four ABCD coordinates are pairwise independent (sufficiency) and no three suffice (necessity). Dimension is earned from arithmetic hierarchy, not postulated.

Statement

%
\label{prop:dim-tau}
The dimension of the ABCD coordinate system is exactly $4$:
\begin{enumerate}
    \item \textbf{Sufficiency:}
          The four coordinates $(A, B, C, D)$
          suffice to encode every object in $\Obj(\tau)$.
    \item \textbf{Necessity:}
          No three of the four coordinates
          suffice to encode all objects.
\end{enumerate}

Proof / Justification

\emph{Sufficiency.}
This is the content of the NF existence theorem
(Proposition~\ref{prop:nf-existence}):
every object has an ABCD encoding.

\emph{Necessity.}
We show that omitting any single coordinate
causes information loss.

Omit $D$:
Objects $\underline{p}$ and $\underline{p} \cdot \underline{q}$
(for primes $\underline{p} > \underline{q}$)
share $(A, B, C) = (\underline{p}, \underline{1}, \underline{1})$
but have $D = \underline{1}$ and $D = \underline{q}$ respectively.
Without $D$, they are conflated.

Omit $A$:
Objects $\underline{2}$ and $\underline{3}$
share $(B, C, D) = (\underline{1}, \underline{1}, \underline{1})$
but have $A = \underline{2}$ and $A = \underline{3}$.
Without $A$, they are conflated.

Omit $B$:
Objects $\underline{p}$ and $\underline{p}^2$
(for any prime $\underline{p}$)
share $(A, C, D) = (\underline{p}, \underline{1}, \underline{1})$
but have $B = \underline{1}$ and $B = \underline{2}$.
Without $B$, they are conflated.

Omit $C$:
Objects $\underline{p}$ and
$\underline{p} \uparrow\uparrow \underline{2}
= \underline{p}^{\underline{p}}$
share the same prime $A = \underline{p}$
but have $C = \underline{1}$ and $C = \underline{2}$.
The exponent changes from $B = \underline{1}$
to $B = \underline{1}$
(with the tetration height carrying the new structure),
so $(A, B, D) = (\underline{p}, \underline{1}, \underline{1})$
for both.
Without $C$, they are conflated.

Source Context

  • Registry source: book-01.jsonl line 56
  • Manuscript source: 2nd-edition/book-i-categorical-foundations/02_mainmatter/part04/ch20-dimension-fibration.tex lines 108-120

Lean / Formalization Notes

  • Formalization: formalized
  • Module: TauLib.BookI.Coordinates.ABCD
  • Name: Tau.Coordinates.dim_tau_eq_four

Dependencies

  • Canonical: I.D17, I.D06

Generated by later projection phases.

Generated by later projection phases.

Revision Notes

  • 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.

Identifiers

  • Corpus ID cid001131
  • Primary alias PRP0009
  • Type Proposition
  • Status canonical
  • Visibility public
  • Version v1

Aliases & legacy IDs

I.P08dimension-theorem-dim-tau-4prop:dim-tau

Release lines

corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2

Relations

Appears in (1)

Sources

  • Monograph cid000023Book I, Part 4, Chapter 20 (Part IV)

Version & History

  • v1 · 2026-05-10 imported from v2 registry

Status disclaimer

A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.

Save or share this page for inspection

Download a portable dossier, copy a reviewer note, or send this page to someone who can inspect it.

Email to expert