DEF0034canonicalv1Split-Complex Scalars
Split-complex unit j with j^2 = +1 (not i^2 = -1). Earned from boundary ring structure. The foundational scalar field for tau-holomorphy.
Payload
Split-Complex Scalars
Split-complex unit j with j^2 = +1 (not i^2 = -1). Earned from boundary ring structure. The foundational scalar field for tau-holomorphy.
Split-Complex Scalars
Summary
Split-complex unit j with j^2 = +1 (not i^2 = -1). Earned from boundary ring structure. The foundational scalar field for tau-holomorphy.
Statement
%
\label{def:split-complex}
The \textbf{split-complex scalar ring}
$\hat{\mathbb{Z}}_\tau[j]$ is the free $\hat{\mathbb{Z}}_\tau$-module
of rank 2, with basis $\{1, j\}$,
equipped with the multiplication rule:
\[
\boxed{%
j^2 = +1.}
\]
Every element of $\hat{\mathbb{Z}}_\tau[j]$
has a unique representation:
\[
x = a + bj,
\quad a, b \in \hat{\mathbb{Z}}_\tau.
\]
Multiplication is defined by:
\[
(a + bj)(c + dj)
= (ac + bd) + (ad + bc)j,
\]
using the distributive law and $j^2 = +1$.
Addition is componentwise:
\[
(a + bj) + (c + dj) = (a + c) + (b + d)j.
\]
Proof / Justification
This item is definitional. No manuscript proof is required.
Source Context
- Registry source:
book-01.jsonlline 38 - Manuscript source:
2nd-edition/book-i-categorical-foundations/02_mainmatter/part10/ch40-split-complex-scalars.texlines 55-82
Lean / Formalization Notes
- Formalization:
formalized - Module:
TauLib.BookI.Boundary.SplitComplex - Name:
Tau.Boundary.SplitComplex
Dependencies
- Canonical: I.D19
Related Results
Generated by later projection phases.
Related Publications
Generated by later projection phases.
Revision Notes
- 2026-04-24: Initial pilot migration.
Identifiers
Aliases & legacy IDs
I.D20split-complex-scalarsdef:split-complexRelease lines
corpus_v3_workingcorpus_v2Relations
Appears in (1)
Sources
Version & History
Status disclaimer
A Corpus Item page reports the program's current internal record for this item. It does not imply external verification, scientific consensus, or final proof unless explicitly stated. Read it together with its dependencies, formalization status, and the program's overall stance.