Chapter 126: No Forced Stance By Theorem

The boundary collapse lemma proved that ℝeg_D cannot settle the ω-germ question: neither inhabitation nor non-inhabitation is diagrammatically demonstrable. This chapter draws the consequence. If the diagrammatic register cannot deliver the answer, then the diagrammatic register cannot force a commitment-register stance. Neither theism nor atheism nor agnosticism is structurally mandated. The symmetry of the collapse ensures that no direction is privileged, no stance is compelled, and no default position is silently installed. The framework delivers the landscape—the 4+1 sectors, the enrichment ladder, the kernel invariants, the Logos sector, the convergence of ι_τ toward ω—and the landscape has shape. But shape is ℝeg_D-content; stance is ℝeg_C-content. The distinction is irreducible.