Ontic Adequacy and the Six Ontic Requirements
M-E3-02
structural canonical
ontology modality reality
External: not applicable
τ response: tau native
What makes a candidate reality admissible? Can a framework state necessary constraints on reality itself, rather than merely describe a model once reality is assumed?
Current τ response
See the paired Ontic Adequacy and the Six Ontic Requirements — Challenge Response on the Results lane for the program's current response status, registry evidence, verification route, and external-review boundary.
Current status: tau native.
Challenge statement
What makes a candidate reality admissible? Can a framework state necessary constraints on reality itself, rather than merely describe a model once reality is assumed?
Why this challenge is in the ledger
τ-native: tests whether OR1-OR6 are genuine ontic requirements or merely meta-theoretical desiderata.
τ-native: tests whether OR1-OR6 are genuine ontic requirements or merely meta-theoretical desiderata.
τ-facing burden
Explicitly route through OR1 (self-coherence), OR2 (completeness), OR3 (generativity), OR4 (independence), OR5 (continuity), OR6 (stability).
First reviewer questions
- Does τ produce extensional results for ontic adequacy and the six ontic requirements?
- Are the τ register routings genuinely informative or merely renaming?
- What external philosophical review would settle the open questions?
Source anchors
Source anchors are background references, not endorsements of Panta Rhei claims.